December 25, 2006
This and the 'other' site are merging into a new common space. All future updates, ranting, pictures, and other miscelaneous detritus will be found at http://web.mac.com/m_reiser.
December 11, 2006
All or Nothing

Up In Smoke...
It all depends upon what side of the pool you live on. That is the dividing line, the border between those who have homes tonight and those who are looking for a new place to live. And in the burned out area it seems to be a matter of luck- maybe you have everything, maybe you have nothing. All determined by the fickle finger of Fate.
Many of you have already heard about the recent events. The best articles I have found online are here and here . I have a preference for the Times' article because the reporter and photographer helped get me access to people and places I could not otherwise have come close to.
The short version of the story is that a young woman, probably a student at Cal State Long Beach, was trying to cook dinner in a first floor apartment. She started a grease fire and, in her ignorance, tossed a pot of water on it. The resulting mess was sucked up by the range hood over the stove and carried into the attic above the third floor. From there the fire was able to drop through vents into apartments and hallways playing Hell all along two floors of a very large apartment building.
In the end, it took two hundred firemen and eight hours to put everything out.
But we were fortunate... very much so. As some of you know, having visited, this is a very large property, 340 units cover an area the size of a city block. There are actually two separate complexes, north and south, connected only at one point. Each complex consists of three connected, but largely independent, buildings. In this case, it appears that only one building is a total loss. Unfortunately however, everyone in the North Complex must leave- it could be months before any of them have power or water, and there is no realistic way to keep any of those units habitable.
Over here in the South Complex, we have power and water. I can barely smell the burned out shell of the other building. Except for the constant stream of people solemnly removing their possessions from the apartments that are at least salvageable.
But back to the beginning... Friday afternoon Sharon and I left at about three o'clock to get a few things at Target. We came back about four and saw smoke coming from the neighborhood of our building. Getting closer, we found that the street was closed and we had to park a block away. I sprinted to the area and saw the north part of our complex in flames. Finding Sharon, we made a quick judgment. The fire was in the north building. There were people still in the office area that divides the two structures. No fire, with a dozen trucks already on scene, could possibly travel that length, including at least four firewalls. Not quickly anyway.
So Sharon and I ran in, dashed down the hall to our apartment at the far south corner, and decided what we needed- the laptops, which have her writing and my photos - one small box of the few family heirlooms that are easily portable. Grab those and run. Not back down the hall toward the fire, but out the apartment (locking the door behind us) and across an adjacent stairwell to an emergency exit. Out to the street.
By now the police had a line around the building and there was no chance of getting back in- not that I'd want to. Decided that the fire wouldn't reach us. Not seriously at least. Anyway, it was getting dark and I noticed that our south complex still had power. Not much to say about the north side. Called my mother and told here we were coming over for the night. Drove across town and watched our neighbors on the evening news.
We were let into our place at about two the next afternoon. That was when I took my pictures. That was also when I latched on to the people from the Times and heard from the Fire Captain that this was the worst fire Long Beach had seen in thirty-six years, and the worst 'structure fire' in living memory. (A 1970 fire destroyed an entire city block when a gas main exploded.) According to him, none of the LBFD chiefs had ever seen any fire spread so fiercely so quickly. There will be questions asked. Questions about fire doors. Questions about emergency planning. But in the end, as with most great accidents, it simply seems that it was the result of everything going wrong that possibly could go wrong. Which is why we call them accidents.
Pics: here
September 25, 2006
Hot Wieners in Warm Buns!
That ought to get me some traffic.
Do we really need an individually wrapped, pre packaged frankfurter?
Apparently Kraft thinks so. Witness the latest abomination of the culture of lazy...
The Oscar Meyer Fast Frank
Now you too can be freed from the drudgery of placing that beastly sausage in a bifurcated bun... food engineers have solved that problem forever!
Condiment application is still your own problem however.
I'm not really against the item per se, because hot dogs truly are a great American food. One of the original industrial meats, they embody everything this great nation stands for. I just can't see a market for simplifying one of the simplest meals in existence. The Fast Frank is obviously not trying to re-create the occult alchemy of the Dodger Dog, the Fenway Frank, or any of the other mystical creations of Major League Baseball. Nor is it trying to achieve the sublime perfection of a grilled dog. In the thirty five seconds it takes to produce this modern wonder, I believe I could actually microwave a regular dog, and have my bun and condiments prepped for application.
When something truly is an advance that improves the quality of my kitchen life, I will embrace it with open arms. But somehow I think it is mildly insulting to lump "microwave single serving hot dogs" in with great inventions like canning, pasteurization, and ramen noodles.
Do we really need an individually wrapped, pre packaged frankfurter?
Apparently Kraft thinks so. Witness the latest abomination of the culture of lazy...
The Oscar Meyer Fast Frank
Now you too can be freed from the drudgery of placing that beastly sausage in a bifurcated bun... food engineers have solved that problem forever!
Condiment application is still your own problem however.
I'm not really against the item per se, because hot dogs truly are a great American food. One of the original industrial meats, they embody everything this great nation stands for. I just can't see a market for simplifying one of the simplest meals in existence. The Fast Frank is obviously not trying to re-create the occult alchemy of the Dodger Dog, the Fenway Frank, or any of the other mystical creations of Major League Baseball. Nor is it trying to achieve the sublime perfection of a grilled dog. In the thirty five seconds it takes to produce this modern wonder, I believe I could actually microwave a regular dog, and have my bun and condiments prepped for application.
When something truly is an advance that improves the quality of my kitchen life, I will embrace it with open arms. But somehow I think it is mildly insulting to lump "microwave single serving hot dogs" in with great inventions like canning, pasteurization, and ramen noodles.
August 24, 2006
Pack Mules of the World-- UNITE!
I swore I'd finally write something today, but it's later in the day than I wanted to attack this, and at this point its as much a labor of pig-headed resolve as a labor of love.
I haven't spent any time in the cave lately because I've been working. I wish I could say it had worked out...
Back in March I took a job as an Admin for an employment agency in Orange County. I thought I was being hired to write reports and help management build the business. In all honesty, I think that is what I was originally hired to do. Unfortunately, that's not what I wound up doing. Then our payroll clerk flipped out and quit. I don't mean Two Week's Notice- 'thank you ma'am but the situation isn't quite working out so I'm leaving for better opportunities'- quit, but 'take this job and shove it up your #@*!' quit.
Which left us with no way to pay three hundred employees...
So I became the payroll clerk. No training, no experience. No clue.
Payroll is one of those jobs that is mentally taxing, but not particularly stimulating. A payroll clerk has to apply a complex set of rules to an infinite set of individual circumstances, with no ability or incentive to improve upon or alter the system. Timecard to late? ... Sucks to be you.
So of course I sucked at the job. I didn't screw up badly enough to actually get fired. I didn't even screw up enough to get yelled at. But I hated the work, and the abuse, and the misery of a job that offers no reward for accomplishment, but plenty of misery for every little mistake.
And It ate at me. I started getting sick in the morning. I started to get nasty. I was always tired and worried about what I had fucked up this week... So I quit.
It's really hard to get up in the morning and drag yourself to a miserable job when you don't need the money, and I don't need the money. I see why people do it, one of my problems as a payroll clerk was too much compassion. I'd bend the rules for a sweet kid who just bough his first car and needed to make sure his check would clear. Need that check a day early? No problem.
And I just couldn't find a reason to get up in the morning, so I gave my Two Week's Notice- 'thank you ma'am but the situation isn't quite working out so I'm leaving for better opportunities', I found/ hired two people to do the job that I had been doing, and I'm once again unemployed. Honestly, I think everyone is the better for it. The receptionist/ admin I hired has the bubbly personality needed for a job like that, and the new payroll clerk is a competent, unambitious, bitch who knows the rules inside an out and cares more about her office's books than the contractors' sob stories.
Oddly, unemployment feels really good. I'm reading again, writing, and shooting (new pictures soon). Too much busyness, too much concern over trivial things destroys the mind's ability to concentrate on more complex problems. Don't believe me, ask the Pope (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/20/AR2006082000183.html).
It's axiomatic in American society that anything but hard labor must be a sign of corruption and weakness. We all know it as the vaunted protestant work ethic, a philosophy that may as well be interpreted as "Arbeit Macht Frei". Success, freedom, and worth in our culture are based upon your position in the job market. The next time someone asks me "What do you do?" I may give them a truthful answer. I eat. I drink (probably too much). I write a bit. I take pictures. Of course I'm expected to give a more relevant answer... to tell them what I do to earn money to buy food and shelter. But food and shelter (and drink even!) are not in immediate peril. Sharon and I could stay the course for months without a dime and not feel the pinch of 'short-rations.'
I don't know what I am doing at this point, but I am going to avoid selling my days to boredom at all costs. It's not worth the early grave. There has to be a better way to support a body and soul. I am planning to work with the camera some and shoot places that have been on my list for months. I'm sweeping out the cave, and promise new rants every few days. I care again, and am willing to lend my talents to anyone who is willing to provide just compensation for product. But get this clear, my time is not for sale.
I haven't spent any time in the cave lately because I've been working. I wish I could say it had worked out...
Back in March I took a job as an Admin for an employment agency in Orange County. I thought I was being hired to write reports and help management build the business. In all honesty, I think that is what I was originally hired to do. Unfortunately, that's not what I wound up doing. Then our payroll clerk flipped out and quit. I don't mean Two Week's Notice- 'thank you ma'am but the situation isn't quite working out so I'm leaving for better opportunities'- quit, but 'take this job and shove it up your #@*!' quit.
Which left us with no way to pay three hundred employees...
So I became the payroll clerk. No training, no experience. No clue.
Payroll is one of those jobs that is mentally taxing, but not particularly stimulating. A payroll clerk has to apply a complex set of rules to an infinite set of individual circumstances, with no ability or incentive to improve upon or alter the system. Timecard to late? ... Sucks to be you.
So of course I sucked at the job. I didn't screw up badly enough to actually get fired. I didn't even screw up enough to get yelled at. But I hated the work, and the abuse, and the misery of a job that offers no reward for accomplishment, but plenty of misery for every little mistake.
And It ate at me. I started getting sick in the morning. I started to get nasty. I was always tired and worried about what I had fucked up this week... So I quit.
It's really hard to get up in the morning and drag yourself to a miserable job when you don't need the money, and I don't need the money. I see why people do it, one of my problems as a payroll clerk was too much compassion. I'd bend the rules for a sweet kid who just bough his first car and needed to make sure his check would clear. Need that check a day early? No problem.
And I just couldn't find a reason to get up in the morning, so I gave my Two Week's Notice- 'thank you ma'am but the situation isn't quite working out so I'm leaving for better opportunities', I found/ hired two people to do the job that I had been doing, and I'm once again unemployed. Honestly, I think everyone is the better for it. The receptionist/ admin I hired has the bubbly personality needed for a job like that, and the new payroll clerk is a competent, unambitious, bitch who knows the rules inside an out and cares more about her office's books than the contractors' sob stories.
Oddly, unemployment feels really good. I'm reading again, writing, and shooting (new pictures soon). Too much busyness, too much concern over trivial things destroys the mind's ability to concentrate on more complex problems. Don't believe me, ask the Pope (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/20/AR2006082000183.html).
It's axiomatic in American society that anything but hard labor must be a sign of corruption and weakness. We all know it as the vaunted protestant work ethic, a philosophy that may as well be interpreted as "Arbeit Macht Frei". Success, freedom, and worth in our culture are based upon your position in the job market. The next time someone asks me "What do you do?" I may give them a truthful answer. I eat. I drink (probably too much). I write a bit. I take pictures. Of course I'm expected to give a more relevant answer... to tell them what I do to earn money to buy food and shelter. But food and shelter (and drink even!) are not in immediate peril. Sharon and I could stay the course for months without a dime and not feel the pinch of 'short-rations.'
I don't know what I am doing at this point, but I am going to avoid selling my days to boredom at all costs. It's not worth the early grave. There has to be a better way to support a body and soul. I am planning to work with the camera some and shoot places that have been on my list for months. I'm sweeping out the cave, and promise new rants every few days. I care again, and am willing to lend my talents to anyone who is willing to provide just compensation for product. But get this clear, my time is not for sale.
February 26, 2006
Olympic Hang-Up

Full explanation later, but The Cave's internet connection has been down for nearly a month. Well, not entirely down, but reduced to the modern equivalent of a pair of tin cans and a piece of string. I'd be sending telegrams if Western Union hadn't stopped the service back in January.
**********
I used to care about the Olympics, honest. I even watched figure skating once every four years, albeit with the semi-detached eye required of every man who still puts on his pants one leg at a time. But this year I just don't seem to care. A bit of bobsled, maybe a couple of figure skaters (but none of the medal contenders), and perhaps a ski run, but then it's nine o'clock and off to Lost or House and off to bed. I could stay up until midnight to find out who wins the (literal) Gold, at least I could try. I'm not actually sure I could make it.
The problem, is that NBC is trying to treat the Olympics as a 'news event.' As if somehow they can build suspense about the outcome of an event that has been over for most of a day and reported about across half the world. But there is no suspense. I went into the final event of women's figure skating with sure knowledge of the result. I didn't particularly care. I wanted to watch the skaters.
Instead of skaters however, I was subjected to a series of overproduced 'human interest' pieces. A sentimental piece on every damn skater so trite that any third rate j-school hack would be ashamed. I never made it to the last group because by eleven-thirty I was fast asleep.
From a programming point of view, it is truly astounding that NBC actually thinks they can keep an audience clear up until midnight, for any event, even big ones like figure skating. If it were a live broadcast, I could at least see the news possibilities, but as a taped production it seems insane. Don't most people work? The last thing I am going to loose sleep over is another story about the skater whose mother needs a kidney transplant.
Not that I'm against kidney transplants. I hope the nice old lady gets hers and lives to a ripe old age. But that is not the point of the Olympics. I don't watch any sport to see how the young man overcomes the tragedy of whatever to succeed in spite of the obstacles the fate puts in his path. If I want that story I have Chariots of Fire somewhere around the house. I watch the Olympics to get my quadrennial fix of athletic competition, and even if I know the outcome I still want to watch.
But I want to watch uninterrupted by constant reminders of how obviously 'touching' everything is. I just want to watch the short track skaters go heat after heat, knowing that half of them won't make it to the next round. There is a visceral competitiveness that is enthralling even if you know who will ultimately prevail. It's like watching a movie when you know the outcome. The drama is not in the outcome, but in the struggle of competition. It's that struggle, the culmination of muscle, mind, luck, and sheer will that enthralls us. For one brief moment the world can be an ice rink, or a bobsled run, or a ski slope. But true to the original spirit of the first games however, it is just as soon all gone, and the real world asserts itself once again.
But I've got to go. The closing ceremony is on and I can hear the gentle strains of Italy's cultural gift to the world- Louis Prima.
February 01, 2006
Cinema Paradise
Cinema Paradise
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (known simply as "The Academy") announced the nominations for the best movies of last year, and I don't care. I simply can't weigh in on a contest when I haven't seen half of the movies nominated. If you want informed opinion, go here- here- otherwise you can stick around for my uninformed ranting.
There is one line in Jan's entry however, that remind me how lucky I am to live in the current cultural center of the Western world:
"Nevertheless, there are some excellent movies on this list, both in terms of craft and in terms of the story they choose to tell. Movies worth seeing, even though some may never make it to small towns this side of DVD."
Wow. I'd forgotten about that. I'm not talking about bizarre foreign 'art house' fare, movies subtitled or dubbed from eastern european languages that feature hollow faced women crying over the loss of what might be either a small child or a large turnip, but I can't tell because the thing seems to have been shot on film stock so grainy it must have been bought at the Pathé brothers' yard sale. I'm talking about real movies with actual actors, coherent plots, shot by competent directors that, for one reason or another, were simply not deemed 'marketable' by the studios and the distributors.
I'd forgotten that I can see movies at Arclight.
So I get to see movies like Constant Gardiner, Pride and Prejudice, Secuestro Express, and Howl's Moving Castle. I get to see entertaining 'popcorn' movies like Mr. & Mrs. Smith while sipping Sam Adams in a room without gum on the floor. I get to see movies like King Kong the way they should be shown, on a screen so wide it curves around the whole front of the theatre. I can see, in a real movie theatre, Gone With the Wind, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and Dr. Strangelove, and in some cases finally understand what all the fuss was about.
This is where people who love movies can see them right. When I saw Kong at a Wednesday matinee a few weeks back, I gradually became cognizant of the fact that the producer of one of the most popular shows on television was directly behind me. Why does someone who could see a free screening of this movie choose to pay twelve bucks to see it with us plebs? The answer is that movies really do require a certain venue. A certain immersion that can't really be duplicated on a small scale.
DVD's just don't cut it. No 54" plasma can compete with a real theatre. And if your ever in town, Arclight's at the corner of Sunset and Ivar.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (known simply as "The Academy") announced the nominations for the best movies of last year, and I don't care. I simply can't weigh in on a contest when I haven't seen half of the movies nominated. If you want informed opinion, go here- here- otherwise you can stick around for my uninformed ranting.
There is one line in Jan's entry however, that remind me how lucky I am to live in the current cultural center of the Western world:
"Nevertheless, there are some excellent movies on this list, both in terms of craft and in terms of the story they choose to tell. Movies worth seeing, even though some may never make it to small towns this side of DVD."
Wow. I'd forgotten about that. I'm not talking about bizarre foreign 'art house' fare, movies subtitled or dubbed from eastern european languages that feature hollow faced women crying over the loss of what might be either a small child or a large turnip, but I can't tell because the thing seems to have been shot on film stock so grainy it must have been bought at the Pathé brothers' yard sale. I'm talking about real movies with actual actors, coherent plots, shot by competent directors that, for one reason or another, were simply not deemed 'marketable' by the studios and the distributors.
I'd forgotten that I can see movies at Arclight.
So I get to see movies like Constant Gardiner, Pride and Prejudice, Secuestro Express, and Howl's Moving Castle. I get to see entertaining 'popcorn' movies like Mr. & Mrs. Smith while sipping Sam Adams in a room without gum on the floor. I get to see movies like King Kong the way they should be shown, on a screen so wide it curves around the whole front of the theatre. I can see, in a real movie theatre, Gone With the Wind, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and Dr. Strangelove, and in some cases finally understand what all the fuss was about.
This is where people who love movies can see them right. When I saw Kong at a Wednesday matinee a few weeks back, I gradually became cognizant of the fact that the producer of one of the most popular shows on television was directly behind me. Why does someone who could see a free screening of this movie choose to pay twelve bucks to see it with us plebs? The answer is that movies really do require a certain venue. A certain immersion that can't really be duplicated on a small scale.
DVD's just don't cut it. No 54" plasma can compete with a real theatre. And if your ever in town, Arclight's at the corner of Sunset and Ivar.
January 24, 2006
The rumors of my death...

I'm not dead, and while a bit mouldy from four months of neglect, the cave is not closed for good. I refuse to walk away from this attempt in the vainglorious pursuit of at least a dozen occasional readers.
So the $.64 dollar question is... what has the philosopher been doing for the last six months? I went off the air largely because I took a short term job that had the small advantage of occasionally allowing me to actually work with Sharon, and the very large disadvantage of keeping me away from her almost all of the time.
Physical exhaustion is not particularly good for the philosophical mind, but that bit is over now and I'm back onto the search for something that at least approximates 'real' employment. It would be simpler if I had a career goal the way most modern people do, a firm desire to be a lawyer, or doctor, or parking garage attendant. The problem is however, that I have this strong desire to simply be married and perhaps raise a family. Everything else is just beans, and so it makes interviews a bit awkward. Interviews typically get to a point-
HR Drone: Mr. Reiser, tell me, *cough* , what makes you want to be a TPS Report Analyst?
And there's not really a good answer for that sort of question, because I don't really want to shovel some disingenuous load of tripe down there throat about how I've always wanted to analyze reports, because it's simply not true. On the other hand, I'm sunk if I look her (no offense ladies, but the interviewers are almost always women for some reason) in the eye and state flatly: "I want the job because I have a wife to feed and rent to pay and nice things I would like." That would be treason, because in modern culture we are all supposed to find our 'economic vocation' and devote our lives and very souls to some variation on 'developing synergy' or 'facilitating communications strategies.'
And it's everywhere... people will come up to you at a party and ask "What do you do?" I'm sometimes tempted to say. "Well, this morning I got up and had a cup of coffee. I'm pretty sure most of the time I was breathing, though there were a few seconds I'm not sure about because Sharon surprised me in the bath. In any event, at the moment I'm talking to a stupid twit who thinks the best way to begin introductions is on business interests."
But I don't. Most of the time I give an evasive answer and find someone I know. At the rare party where creative people might be about I call myself 'an unsuccessful freelance photographer.' It's mostly true, gets us off the subject of work, and sometimes gets the conversation on to a subject that I actually like to discuss.
End of rant, there's more pedestrian news to get to. If anyone has or soon will try to access the pictures at homepage.mac.com/m_reiser, don't be surprised to notice that they are gone. That whole site is being rebuilt as time permits. Also, I give notice that I may disparate from the internet for days at a time. I'll go into details later, but it involves myself, Verizon DSL service, and a technologically ignorant neighbor.
Minutiae out of the way however, the important news is that Sharon and I have moved once again. I'll go into gory details sometime in the next few days, but I am now finally master of my domain once again. It will be nice to be able to entertain guests of our own once again. The new address will eventually appear in the alumni directory for 'the community of those who know', but any interested parties can get it by e-mailing me at matt.reiser@mac.com.
That's it for tonight. This place is dirty and I think I see a spider under that rock... or is it just the form of a spider?

